Any storage protocol aiming to break the existing paradigm cannot avoid a fundamental reality: there is always a gap between the ideal state and initial operation. Walrus is clearly aware of this; they do not shy away from it, but instead openly discuss the four major challenges they aim to address.
**The Trade-off Between Decentralization and Performance**
In the early stages, to ensure network stability, Walrus relies on a group of high-performance nodes. But the long-term goal is clear—moving toward true decentralization. The key lies in how to craft economic incentives that motivate small nodes around the world to participate, without sacrificing the overall network performance. This is not just a technical issue but an economic design challenge.
Token value derives from network usage. This means storage pricing must find a balance point: it should cover costs and generate profits for node operators, while also offering overwhelming price advantages to users. In simple terms, the cake must be big enough and distributed in a way that satisfies all parties. This requires continuously optimized economic models rather than fixed rules.
**Security Challenges Brought by "Programmable Storage"**
The dynamic interaction capabilities at the smart contract layer essentially open new attack surfaces. As the value of stored data increases, Walrus needs to work closely with security agencies to establish more comprehensive audit standards and vulnerability feedback mechanisms. Some high-value data may also require additional insurance or custodial support.
**Time Is Needed for Developers’ Mindset Shift**
No matter how advanced the technology, if developers are unwilling to learn or use it, it’s all for nothing. Helping teams accustomed to traditional storage paradigms understand and migrate to the new concept of "programmable storage" requires ongoing education and validation through real-world scenarios. Walrus must continually prove its irreplaceability in terms of stability, usability, and practical application.
The Walrus team and community are actively addressing these challenges. Recognizing the challenges themselves is the first step toward solving them.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
3 Likes
Reward
3
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SerRugResistant
· 8h ago
Oh no, this is the norm in Web3—ideals and reality are a hundred thousand miles apart.
---
Decentralization versus performance? Playing the economic incentives well is the real key.
---
$WAL stability still depends on whether the network has real demand; no matter how well-designed air tokens are, it's all pointless.
---
Programmable storage sounds cool, but it also opens up attack surfaces. These auditing firms will have more business again.
---
Honestly, the hardest part for developers is migration. They are already used to traditional solutions, and the cost of changing their mindset is too high.
---
Honest take: These four major issues are old problems. Every new protocol has to try again from scratch.
---
I just want to see if Walrus can really make a difference, or else it will just be another story of "revolutionary storage."
View OriginalReply0
OnchainHolmes
· 8h ago
It's another story of "ideal is very full but reality is very bone," but I quite appreciate Walrus's honest approach.
The incentive model for small nodes is really a tough problem... Technology alone isn't enough; we need retail investors to also be able to make money, otherwise who will play with you in decentralized systems?
$WAL stability is the most critical; if the pricing peg isn't good, the entire model could break apart.
I'm a bit worried about programmable storage; what happens if there's a contract bug and data is lost... The insurance mechanism needs to keep up.
The migration cost for developers has been underestimated; no matter how much education you do, it can't change users' lazy nature, haha.
View OriginalReply0
AllInDaddy
· 8h ago
Can decentralization and profit be satisfied at the same time? It feels like a vicious cycle.
Honestly, I'm a bit skeptical about whether $WAL can hold up...
Programmable storage sounds advanced, but once security vulnerabilities emerge, the true nature is exposed.
Developers changing their mindset? Haha, it's even harder than getting whales to turn around.
View OriginalReply0
DegenWhisperer
· 8h ago
Decentralization and making money are really hard to synchronize; finding this balance point is too difficult.
---
Honestly, whether $WAL can stabilize depends on whether users are willing to buy in.
---
Programmable storage sounds impressive, but it's doomed once security vulnerabilities are exposed.
---
Developer education is truly a pain point; the cost of changing mindsets is too high.
---
Projects that dare to openly discuss problems actually make people a bit more optimistic.
---
The path of storage protocols is really not that easy; we've suffered too many losses along the way.
---
Solving the cake distribution problem is pointless if nothing is done; all parties want a bigger slice.
---
Economic incentives need to be well-designed for small nodes to have the desire to participate; right now, this area is still blank.
Any storage protocol aiming to break the existing paradigm cannot avoid a fundamental reality: there is always a gap between the ideal state and initial operation. Walrus is clearly aware of this; they do not shy away from it, but instead openly discuss the four major challenges they aim to address.
**The Trade-off Between Decentralization and Performance**
In the early stages, to ensure network stability, Walrus relies on a group of high-performance nodes. But the long-term goal is clear—moving toward true decentralization. The key lies in how to craft economic incentives that motivate small nodes around the world to participate, without sacrificing the overall network performance. This is not just a technical issue but an economic design challenge.
**How Can the Value of $WAL Be Stabilized**
Token value derives from network usage. This means storage pricing must find a balance point: it should cover costs and generate profits for node operators, while also offering overwhelming price advantages to users. In simple terms, the cake must be big enough and distributed in a way that satisfies all parties. This requires continuously optimized economic models rather than fixed rules.
**Security Challenges Brought by "Programmable Storage"**
The dynamic interaction capabilities at the smart contract layer essentially open new attack surfaces. As the value of stored data increases, Walrus needs to work closely with security agencies to establish more comprehensive audit standards and vulnerability feedback mechanisms. Some high-value data may also require additional insurance or custodial support.
**Time Is Needed for Developers’ Mindset Shift**
No matter how advanced the technology, if developers are unwilling to learn or use it, it’s all for nothing. Helping teams accustomed to traditional storage paradigms understand and migrate to the new concept of "programmable storage" requires ongoing education and validation through real-world scenarios. Walrus must continually prove its irreplaceability in terms of stability, usability, and practical application.
The Walrus team and community are actively addressing these challenges. Recognizing the challenges themselves is the first step toward solving them.