Bitcoin's underperformance relative to hard assets at this level historically precedes notable rebounds. The divergence between BTC and traditional hard asset strength creates an interesting setup—when this gap widens this significantly, mean reversion typically follows. Worth monitoring the confluence of these signals for potential upside moves.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
RektCoaster
· 6h ago
The mean reversion approach is back again, always saying there will be a rebound but the outcome remains the same.
View OriginalReply0
GhostAddressMiner
· 6h ago
The talk about mean reversion has been heard too many times, but the key is to see who is quietly accumulating... After carefully scanning the on-chain data, some early dormant addresses have recently shown signs of abnormal awakening.
View OriginalReply0
quiet_lurker
· 6h ago
The idea of mean reversion comes up every year. How long can it be copied?
View OriginalReply0
FudVaccinator
· 7h ago
Mean reversion theory has been heard many times; is this really different this time?
View OriginalReply0
MetaEggplant
· 7h ago
Mean reversion sounds very tempting, but will this time really be different...
Bitcoin's underperformance relative to hard assets at this level historically precedes notable rebounds. The divergence between BTC and traditional hard asset strength creates an interesting setup—when this gap widens this significantly, mean reversion typically follows. Worth monitoring the confluence of these signals for potential upside moves.