This morning I mentioned to be cautious of the $BEAT trap, now let's review a few suspicious points.
Regarding the long-short ratio, the market maker should ideally release the large investors who are trapped, but the current trend is a bit forced. This wave of rise indeed benefited from the overall market, but the theoretical increase is only about 15%, making it hard to exceed expectations.
Looking at the capital aspect—this is the key. The current influx of funds is not from whales' spot holdings, but from retail investors banding together. How long this kind of market can last is really questionable. Lastly, the fee structure has remained unchanged from start to finish, still in the positive fee state, which indicates that genuine institutional players are not actively involved.
Overall, this rebound relies on retail investor sentiment, lacking real capital support, and the risks need to be taken seriously.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
gas_fee_therapist
· 01-14 07:50
Retail investors band together to pump the market, while institutions remain inactive. This is the biggest risk signal.
View OriginalReply0
JustAnotherWallet
· 01-14 07:43
Retail investors band together to push the market, while institutions haven't moved. This buy and sell is a cliffhanger.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityOracle
· 01-14 07:39
Retail investors band together to pump the market, but the fees haven't moved. This is just self-entertainment.
View OriginalReply0
Degentleman
· 01-14 07:38
I've seen retail investors band together many times. Every time, they push the price up and then start to cut the leeks. The fact that the transaction fee hasn't changed indicates that the big players aren't following the trend. That's the most terrifying signal.
View OriginalReply0
ColdWalletAnxiety
· 01-14 07:35
Retail investors banding together to push the market, isn't this just the prelude to the bagholders? No change in fees indicates that big institutions are watching; I'm skeptical.
View OriginalReply0
GasBandit
· 01-14 07:25
Retail investors band together to pump the market, while institutions are just watching the show. This kind of market trend will eventually break down.
View OriginalReply0
赚够500Wu退圈
· 01-14 07:23
No wonder I felt weak at 0.52, damn it, I kept adding to my position during the dip.
This morning I mentioned to be cautious of the $BEAT trap, now let's review a few suspicious points.
Regarding the long-short ratio, the market maker should ideally release the large investors who are trapped, but the current trend is a bit forced. This wave of rise indeed benefited from the overall market, but the theoretical increase is only about 15%, making it hard to exceed expectations.
Looking at the capital aspect—this is the key. The current influx of funds is not from whales' spot holdings, but from retail investors banding together. How long this kind of market can last is really questionable. Lastly, the fee structure has remained unchanged from start to finish, still in the positive fee state, which indicates that genuine institutional players are not actively involved.
Overall, this rebound relies on retail investor sentiment, lacking real capital support, and the risks need to be taken seriously.