2026-01-14 05:33:29

DeepNode recently explained issues related to market maker liquidity depth. According to the technical team, this is a common challenge in liquidity management and does not pose an underlying security risk. Currently, the team is working closely with market makers to improve market liquidity by optimizing market-making strategies. Such issues are quite common in exchange ecosystems, and proper solutions can significantly enhance the trading experience.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DeFiCaffeinator

· 7h ago

The issue of market makers can actually be well addressed, which is quite rare. However, looking at DeepNode's attitude, it's quite reliable.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoGoldmine

· 10h ago

Liquidity depth issues sound good, but essentially it's about sparse order books. Let's look at the data. --- When it comes to market-making strategy optimization, the actual execution results matter. ROI is the key metric. --- The overall problem with exchange ecosystems has been addressed by the computing network, which is worth referencing. --- Safety is a prerequisite. The key to improving trading experience lies in cost control—it's important to do the math. --- Partnering with market makers sounds good, but we need to be wary of liquidity mining tricks. --- These common challenges usually take 3-6 months to see results. Mid-term attention is very important. --- What is the investment return cycle for optimizing market-making strategies? That’s the core issue. --- Is there data supporting the improvement in trading experience, or is it just slogan-like rhetoric?

View OriginalReply0

MevSandwich

· 11h ago

I've heard the phrase "deep cooperation" too many times. Can it really improve things?

View OriginalReply0

ForkTongue

· 01-14 06:01

Liquidity depth is causing a fuss again? Sounds good, but it's just the same old story --- As long as there are no security vulnerabilities, it’s all the same --- Wait, can market maker strategy optimization really improve? I feel like it's just the same old trick to fool people --- It's a common problem in exchange ecosystems, I've been numb to it for a long time --- This kind of issue should have been resolved ten days or half a month ago, and you're only bringing it up now? --- Partnering with market makers is a very complicated matter, my friend --- Using the same old excuse again, that cooperation can make things better? I doubt it --- I've heard too many times that there are no security risks

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHustler

· 01-14 06:01

Liquidity issues again? I've heard this explanation from DeepNode several times before. Deep Node is again passing the buck to market makers, it never ends. They keep talking about optimization every day, but there's no improvement. Let's cooperate, but it's still the same old story. Could these problems be related to security...

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-afe07a92

· 01-14 05:59

Liquidity issues sound nice, but frankly it's still a lack of funds. I've seen too many of these kinds of statements.

View OriginalReply0

NewDAOdreamer

· 01-14 05:47

Liquidity issues are a common topic, the key is whether they can really be solved. --- It's the same story of market maker cooperation—when will we see actual results? --- Why do other exchanges not have these common challenges? --- As long as there's no safety risk, I just care about not getting trapped by liquidity issues. --- Deep collaboration sounds good, but I'm worried it's just another PPT promise. --- The trading experience definitely needs to be improved; the slippage is too high to tolerate. --- Just because problems are common doesn't mean there are no issues; that logic is a bit...

View OriginalReply0