There's something peculiar happening in the crypto space lately. Projects launching without any innovation angle—no airdrop mechanics, no meaningful updates, just straight-up replicas of existing ideas. When you dig deeper, the puzzle becomes clearer: these clones don't introduce anything of value to the ecosystem. They primarily serve one entity—the creators cashing in on the hype cycle. It's a pattern worth discussing: how many derivative projects can the market absorb before users demand actual differentiation? The question isn't whether forks will continue, but whether they'll eventually lose their appeal.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
CommunityWorkervip
· 17h ago
Another batch of air coins, so annoying
View OriginalReply0
SerLiquidatedvip
· 17h ago
Another pile of copy-paste garbage coins, it's really annoying.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHuntressvip
· 17h ago
Another round of copy-paste frenzy. After research and analysis, the tokenomics design of such projects has significant issues. You can spot the clues by following these wallet addresses—early tokens are all in the project's hands, a typical capital game strategy. Historical data shows that the lifecycle of these clone projects does not exceed three months. Caution is advised regarding risks.
View OriginalReply0
OvertimeSquidvip
· 17h ago
Another bunch of copy-paste spam projects, really getting on my nerves.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)