The Market Opportunity Is Real, But the Path Is Messy
The hydrogen sector is at an inflection point. After years of hype followed by disappointment, the industry is beginning to separate winners from losers. Projections suggest the global hydrogen market could hit $1.4 trillion annually by 2050, with the US and over 60 other nations now actively pursuing hydrogen strategies. The catch? Only 4% of hydrogen projects announced since 2020 remain operational today.
This graveyard of failed initiatives isn’t a sign to avoid the space—it’s a filtering mechanism. The companies that survived the brutal downturn and continue pushing forward are positioned to capture enormous value as the market finally accelerates.
The Real Challenge: Scaling Green Hydrogen
Before diving into stock picks, understand what’s actually happening in hydrogen production. Approximately 99.9% of hydrogen today is “grey” or “brown”—produced through fossil fuel-intensive processes. True “green” hydrogen, created through clean electrolysis, remains a tiny fraction of total production.
This matters because cost remains prohibitive and infrastructure is fragmented. Governments and investors are backing hydrogen, but adoption speed varies significantly across the US, Europe, and Asia. Policy support is growing, yet regulatory uncertainty still threatens project timelines.
Three Contrasting Paths to Hydrogen Dominance
Bloom Energy: The Differentiated Play
Bloom Energy stands apart from competitors through its solid oxide fuel cell technology, which delivers superior efficiency and fuel adaptability. The company is already profitable on a non-GAAP basis and is projected to generate approximately $2 billion in 2025 revenue.
The real differentiator is Bloom’s momentum in powering data centers. As AI infrastructure demands explosive growth in electricity, Bloom positioned itself as a critical supplier. The company has real traction, proven technology, and near-term revenue visibility.
The downside: valuation may be stretched relative to current financials, and scaling at market expectations remains a steep challenge.
Plug Power: The High-Risk, High-Reward Bet
Plug Power is the messiest story here. Down 79% from its peak, saddled with debt, and burning cash rapidly, the company’s 2025 liquidity crisis nearly spelled the end. Yet a $370 million institutional investment in October 2025 bought the company runway, with potential for another $1.4 billion if needed.
Plug’s audacious bet: become a vertically integrated hydrogen producer, from electrolyzers to distribution networks. Partnerships with giants like Walmart and Amazon hint at real-world deployment potential. If Plug executes this vision, the upside is transformational. If not, losses could deepen.
This is a turnaround play, not a safe investment. Only suitable for risk-tolerant, long-term holders.
Linde: The Conservative Hydrogen Exposure
Linde is the safest entry point for hydrogen exposure. One of the world’s largest industrial gas suppliers, the company already supplies hydrogen to refineries and chemical plants globally. Now it’s pivoting toward clean hydrogen, constructing green hydrogen facilities across the US and Europe.
Linde offers the appeal of an established, diversified industrial giant. The company pays $6 annually in dividends and generates consistent cash flow. Volatility is far lower than Plug or Bloom.
The trade-off: don’t expect explosive growth. Linde is a slow-and-steady play in a fast-moving market.
The Verdict: Match Risk Tolerance to Position
For aggressive investors with decade-plus horizons, Plug Power offers the biggest upside if it survives and executes. Bloom Energy appeals to growth-focused investors seeking profitable companies with near-term catalysts. Linde suits conservative portfolios seeking stable hydrogen exposure with downside protection.
All three have experienced significant drawdowns since the 2020-2021 hydrogen boom. Current valuations reflect this sobering reality, making entry prices more reasonable than they’ve been in years. The hydrogen market will expand unevenly and slowly, but the survivors of this shakeout stand to capture disproportionate value over the next two decades.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Hydrogen: Why These Three Companies Could Dominate a $1.4 Trillion Market
The Market Opportunity Is Real, But the Path Is Messy
The hydrogen sector is at an inflection point. After years of hype followed by disappointment, the industry is beginning to separate winners from losers. Projections suggest the global hydrogen market could hit $1.4 trillion annually by 2050, with the US and over 60 other nations now actively pursuing hydrogen strategies. The catch? Only 4% of hydrogen projects announced since 2020 remain operational today.
This graveyard of failed initiatives isn’t a sign to avoid the space—it’s a filtering mechanism. The companies that survived the brutal downturn and continue pushing forward are positioned to capture enormous value as the market finally accelerates.
The Real Challenge: Scaling Green Hydrogen
Before diving into stock picks, understand what’s actually happening in hydrogen production. Approximately 99.9% of hydrogen today is “grey” or “brown”—produced through fossil fuel-intensive processes. True “green” hydrogen, created through clean electrolysis, remains a tiny fraction of total production.
This matters because cost remains prohibitive and infrastructure is fragmented. Governments and investors are backing hydrogen, but adoption speed varies significantly across the US, Europe, and Asia. Policy support is growing, yet regulatory uncertainty still threatens project timelines.
Three Contrasting Paths to Hydrogen Dominance
Bloom Energy: The Differentiated Play
Bloom Energy stands apart from competitors through its solid oxide fuel cell technology, which delivers superior efficiency and fuel adaptability. The company is already profitable on a non-GAAP basis and is projected to generate approximately $2 billion in 2025 revenue.
The real differentiator is Bloom’s momentum in powering data centers. As AI infrastructure demands explosive growth in electricity, Bloom positioned itself as a critical supplier. The company has real traction, proven technology, and near-term revenue visibility.
The downside: valuation may be stretched relative to current financials, and scaling at market expectations remains a steep challenge.
Plug Power: The High-Risk, High-Reward Bet
Plug Power is the messiest story here. Down 79% from its peak, saddled with debt, and burning cash rapidly, the company’s 2025 liquidity crisis nearly spelled the end. Yet a $370 million institutional investment in October 2025 bought the company runway, with potential for another $1.4 billion if needed.
Plug’s audacious bet: become a vertically integrated hydrogen producer, from electrolyzers to distribution networks. Partnerships with giants like Walmart and Amazon hint at real-world deployment potential. If Plug executes this vision, the upside is transformational. If not, losses could deepen.
This is a turnaround play, not a safe investment. Only suitable for risk-tolerant, long-term holders.
Linde: The Conservative Hydrogen Exposure
Linde is the safest entry point for hydrogen exposure. One of the world’s largest industrial gas suppliers, the company already supplies hydrogen to refineries and chemical plants globally. Now it’s pivoting toward clean hydrogen, constructing green hydrogen facilities across the US and Europe.
Linde offers the appeal of an established, diversified industrial giant. The company pays $6 annually in dividends and generates consistent cash flow. Volatility is far lower than Plug or Bloom.
The trade-off: don’t expect explosive growth. Linde is a slow-and-steady play in a fast-moving market.
The Verdict: Match Risk Tolerance to Position
For aggressive investors with decade-plus horizons, Plug Power offers the biggest upside if it survives and executes. Bloom Energy appeals to growth-focused investors seeking profitable companies with near-term catalysts. Linde suits conservative portfolios seeking stable hydrogen exposure with downside protection.
All three have experienced significant drawdowns since the 2020-2021 hydrogen boom. Current valuations reflect this sobering reality, making entry prices more reasonable than they’ve been in years. The hydrogen market will expand unevenly and slowly, but the survivors of this shakeout stand to capture disproportionate value over the next two decades.