# I Have a Different View on CRCL



Some people say that if CRCL’s profits are split, it loses its value. That logic doesn’t hold up.

In the stablecoin business, spending heavily on early-stage promotion is normal, but you shouldn’t treat promotional costs as a permanent burden. The key is whether network effects can be achieved—once user habits are formed and mindshare is captured, any money burned early on is a worthwhile investment.

More importantly, there’s a harsh reality in the stablecoin space: **this is a winner-takes-all game**. Whoever achieves scale first gains pricing power and the right to speak. Think about how USDT rose to the top—it made its pie bigger first, and then it became almost impossible for others to shake it.

What CRCL is fighting for now is exactly this—whoever reaches scale first gets the ticket to the future. As for profit distribution, that’s only something to worry about after you’ve established your foothold.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
InscriptionGrillervip
· 12-06 04:58
Uh... I've heard the "winner takes all" talk too many times. It's always the same story, and what happens in the end? It just ends up paving the way for the big players.
View OriginalReply0
ProofOfNothingvip
· 12-06 04:58
I've heard the "winner takes all" logic too many times, but in the end, it still comes down to who can hold out until that day... USDT didn't become what it is today overnight either.
View OriginalReply0
RugpullSurvivorvip
· 12-06 04:51
I've heard the "winner takes all" theory too many times, but can CRCL really achieve scale? The previous projects said the same thing, and what happened... just burning money doesn't work.
View OriginalReply0
MerkleMaidvip
· 12-06 04:49
A typical hindsight narrative. Spending heavily in the early stage is indeed necessary, but CRCL still hasn’t proven it can succeed. It’s just a gambler’s mentality.
View OriginalReply0
Layer3Dreamervip
· 12-06 04:37
theoretically speaking, if we model CRCL's network effects through recursive game theory... the winner-takes-all thesis actually mirrors cross-rollup state verification dynamics. scale first, optimize later—that's literally how interoperability vectors establish dominance in fragmented systems.
Reply0
AirdropChaservip
· 12-06 04:33
Winner-takes-all is indeed the reality of this game, but the question is, can CRCL actually succeed?
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainNewbievip
· 12-06 04:31
That's right, the winner-takes-all logic truly applies to stablecoins. Burning money in the early stages isn't scary; what's scary is failing to achieve scale.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)